Publication Ethics Statement:IJRIAR is committed to publish high quality of the research works in the areas of Social Sciences and Humanities, Medical Sciences, Agricultural Sciences, Management, Engineering, Biology and Physical Education. For all parties involved in the act of publishing (the author, the journal editor(s), the peer reviewer and the publisher) it is necessary to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior. The ethics statements for our journal are based on the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors (

Authors' responsibilities
  1. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work.

  2. Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.

  3. Authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere

  4. Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.

  5. All Authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the research.

  6. Authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic.

  7. Authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.

  8. Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.

  9. Authors must report any errors they discover in their published paper to the Editors.

  10. Authors must participate in the peer review process.

  11. Authors should acknowledge all significant funders of the research pertaining to their article and list all relevant competing interests.

  12. Other sources of support for publications should also be clearly identified in the manuscript, usually in an acknowledgement (e.g. funding for the article processing charge; language editing or editorial assistance).

  13. The Corresponding author should provide the declaration of any conflicts of interest on behalf of all Authors. Conflicts of interest may be associated with employment, sources of funding, personal financial interests, and membership of relevant organizations or others.

Editors' responsibilities
  1. Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.

  2. Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.

  3. Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.

  4. Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.

  5. Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.

  6. Editors should have a clear picture of a research's funding sources.

  7. Editors should base their decisions solely one the papers' importance, originality, clarity and relevance to publication's scope.

  8. Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason.

  9. Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers.

  10. Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.

  11. Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain.

  12. Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.

  13. Editors should not reject papers based on suspicions; they should have proof of misconduct.

  14. Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers and board members.

Reviewers' responsibilities
  1. Reviewers have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article of the initial submission.

  2. Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information.

  3. Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author.

  4. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

  5. Reviewers should base their decisions solely one the papers' importance, originality, clarity and relevance to publication's scope.

  6. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.

  7. Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

  8. Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Publisher Responsibilities
  1. International Journal of Recent Innovations in Academic Research is a scientific journal publisher is responsible for publishing article after the process of editing, peer review and layouts in accordance to the rules of scientific journal publishing.

  2. IJRIAR is responsible for guaranteeing academic freedom of editor and reviewer in running their job.

  3. IJRIAR is responsible for keeping privacy and protects intellectual property and copyright as well as editorial freedom.